Most companies suffer from an invisible ailment: misalignment. Leadership wants innovation, but processes are rigid. Teams want autonomy, but the organisation imposes centralised control. The result? A massive loss of energy, time and money — and a strategy that never truly materialises on the ground.
Performance does not depend solely on the quality of a vision or the talent of employees, but on the coherence between three critical levels of the organisation.
The IOD Core R6 model is a compass designed to make that coherence visible, measurable and actionable.
For a company to succeed sustainably, its three tiers must "speak" the same language:
The central principle of the model is isomorphism: the same structural tensions exist at each of these three levels. What happens in the mind of the executive (S) is reflected in the organisation's processes (O) and in the team's competencies (I). If you call for innovation (S) but your bonus system rewards only procedural compliance (O), you create a friction that paralyses the whole. IOD Core R6 makes these frictions visible so you can eliminate them.
The R6 approach identifies three fundamental tensions present at every tier of the S-O-I model. A high-performing organisation does not choose a side — it dynamically regulates both poles of each axis.
| Axis | Agentic pole | Instrumental pole |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Posture | Consistency & accountability: honouring commitments and values. | Innovation & transformation: adapting to change. |
| 2. Coordination | Autonomy: deciding and acting quickly within one's scope. | Integration: collaborating and synchronising collective efforts. |
| 3. Réalisation | Result (production): delivering concrete, immediate outputs. | Method (orchestration): ensuring reproducibility and scale |
Examples:
IOD Core R6 operates simultaneously on two complementary levels.
Both levels revolve around a common language: HR professionals, technical staff and executives share the same framework for diagnosing problems — without the misunderstandings that arise from differences in vocabulary or professional culture.
The model has been developed progressively since 2006, tested and refined across a wide range of organisational contexts — from industrial companies to public sector bodies, in demanding multicultural environments.
It does not offer a static equilibrium, but a dynamic calibration tool: each tension can be tuned according to the strategic context of the moment, the constraints of the organisation, and the maturity level of the teams. This is what makes it possible to transform isolated successes into permanent organisational capabilities — and to bring strategy down to where it actually creates value.